US Senate Votes to Repeal California’s Gasoline Vehicle Ban

News Summary

The US Senate has voted 51-44 to repeal California’s plan to ban gasoline-powered cars by 2035, challenging the state’s ambitious environmental initiatives. This decision potentially impacts 11 other states and may hinder the transition to electric vehicles. Critics argue it undermines health benefits associated with reduced emissions and poses risks to state authority in environmental governance. Governor Gavin Newsom condemns the vote as detrimental to innovation and public health, while Republican senators raise concerns about consumer choice and energy grid strain. A legal battle between California and the federal government seems imminent.

California – The US Senate passed a resolution on Thursday with a vote of 51-44 to repeal California’s ambitious plan to ban gasoline-powered cars and other vehicles by 2035. This significant legislative action now heads to President Donald Trump, who is anticipated to sign it into law, ultimately countering California’s efforts to lead in the transition to electric vehicles.

The Senate’s decision serves as a direct response to action taken under the previous administration, which rolled back an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) waiver. This waiver had permitted California to set stricter emissions standards than those mandated at the federal level. With the repeal, the state will lose its authority to introduce tougher environmental rules that have been in place for 50 years.

California’s plan aimed to reshape the automotive landscape by significantly increasing the sales of zero-emission vehicles. The state had established regulations, such as the Advanced Clean Cars II rule, which required that 35% of new vehicles sold at California dealerships be zero-emission or plug-in hybrids by 2024. By 2035, this policy would have effectively prohibited the sale of any new gasoline-only vehicles.

The implications of the repeal extend beyond California, as the measure could adversely affect at least 11 other states that were poised to adopt similar regulations. Collectively, these states represent around 40% of the U.S. auto market, making the Senate’s decision a substantial setback for nationwide electric vehicle initiatives.

The rejection of California’s program also suggests a potential threat to the health benefits associated with reduced emissions. Estimates indicate that the ban on gasoline cars could have produced up to $13 billion in health benefits, including preventing approximately 1,200 premature deaths every year due to better air quality.

California’s sales of zero-emission vehicles accounted for about 25% of total new car sales in the state from 2023 to 2024. Critics of the Senate vote, including California Governor Gavin Newsom, argue that this move will ultimately aid foreign competitors like China in advancing vehicle technologies and represents a regression toward policies that contribute to pollution.

In a noteworthy political dynamic, only one Democrat, Senator Elissa Slotkin from Michigan, aligned with Republicans to support the block of California’s greenhouse gas regulations. The introduction of this resolution signals a broader challenge against state-level environmental governance and has been perceived by Democrats as a direct attack on state authority.

Supporting arguments from Republican senators highlight concerns that California’s stringent regulations may hinder consumer choice and potentially strain the national energy grid. They assert that maintaining federal oversight can better facilitate a balanced approach to environmental standards that protect both consumers and industry growth.

Additionally, the Senate approved four further resolutions aimed at obstructing California’s clean-air protocols specifically for heavy-duty vehicles. This combination of legislative actions not only challenges environmental policies but may set a precedent for future Congressional interventions against state regulations.

California has consistently sought federal waivers from the EPA over 100 times to implement its rigorous emission standards, which many observers regard as crucial for public health and environmental protection. The use of the Congressional Review Act to negate California’s policies has drawn criticism, with many deeming it a misuse of legislative power that could undermine state rights and public health safeguards.

With California poised to contest the recent votes legally, a battle of laws is anticipated, as the state seeks to reinstate its emissions rules, arguing that the Congressional decision is both unjust and unlawful. This ongoing conflict illustrates the delicate balance between federal oversight and state authority in environmental policy, shaping the future of the automotive industry in America.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

• The New York Times
• Los Angeles Times
• Associated Press
• Bloomberg
• The Center Square
• Wikipedia: California State Emissions Standards
• Google Search: California gasoline car ban
• Google Scholar: California vehicle emissions regulations
• Encyclopedia Britannica: Automobile
• Google News: California car ban 2025